Back to blog
Microservices vs Monolith: The Honest Guide
Architecture12 min readOct 28, 2024

Microservices vs Monolith: The Honest Guide

Microservices vs monolith: pros and cons of both architectures. When to choose each and why you probably don't need microservices yet.
Diego Velez
Diego Velez
Technical leadership

The Hype Cycle

Microservices are the "industry standard" at big tech, so every startup thinks they need them from day one. That leads to "distributed monoliths": all the complexity of microservices without the benefits.

The Monolith (The Misunderstood Hero)

A monolith is a single unit of code.

  • Pros: Easy to deploy and test, no network latency between components
  • Cons: Can become a "big ball of mud" if not structured well

Microservices (The Powerful Beast)

Splitting your app into independent services.

  • Pros: Independent scaling, team autonomy, technology flexibility
  • Cons: High operational overhead, complex debugging, network headaches

When to Make the Leap

We follow "Monolith first." Start with a well-structured monolith. Only when a specific part of your app has very different scaling needs (e.g. an image-processing service in a sea of simple CRUDs) should you extract it into a separate service.

Conclusion

Scale is a luxury problem. Don't solve problems you don't have yet. Build your monolith with clear internal boundaries and the transition to microservices will be straightforward if you ever need it.

Construye tu futuro.

¿Listo para transformar tu infraestructura con agentes de IA inteligentes?

Book assessment